Reflections in
this journal are made mainly from the point of a visiting observer of IT (Information
Technology) or ICT (Information & Communication Technology) in some Kimberley
Aboriginal Schools K – Year 10.
Module 2: Me & My Computer: Now What?
| Article: | Switched on Learning: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning through the Use of Information and Learning Technologies. (Kimber and Deighton. No date) |
| http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/lt/Switched/sol.html |
Summary & Notes:
"If we think of technology as 'the applied science of…', then information
technology is application of the science of information and information systems
and results in the development of tools for managing information. Learning technology,
on the other hand, is the applied science of learning. It is the application
of all that we know about human learning to develop strategies and tools for
enhancing and managing learning." Dr Julia Atkin ("Enhancing Learning
With Information Technology", 1998:2)
"The seamless use of learning technologies can therefore create a classroom
environment where the status quo is challenged and acts as the catalyst for
shifts in the relationships between teacher and students and the methods of
teaching and learning. These technologies hold great promise. "Information
technology relieves teachers of the burden of being the information source and
redefines their role. Information technology enables access to information anywhere,
anytime." (Atkin, 1998:12).
In an evolution rather than a revolution, this shift involves movement from
instruction to construction, traditional to innovative, the comfortable to that
which can be risky; from the teacher-centred to learner-centred model, where
meaning becomes constructed in the learners' mind and problem-solving enhances
student engagement and interest."
Reflection:
A learning situation based on ICT and recent developments in learning theory will emphasise:
| Article: | Computers as Tools for Teaching and Learning. (Tasmanian Department of Education, Community and Cultural Development. September 1997) |
| http://www/ecpd.tased.edu.au/toolsTL/tools.html |
Summary:
|
- Ideas and Information. |
Reflection:
The Tables of Good Practice are valuable as they address the role of different
groups in a school and begin to move beyond the "technical" issues.
Because ICT is relatively new to many teachers, there is a tension between ICT
as a discipline (like Physics or Food Technology - where skills relate to the
particular subject area) and ICT as a Literacy (like Reading or Writing or using
the Library Catalogue - where the skills are developed are a tool that relates
to all subject areas). This paper is relatively old and, expectedly, emphasises
the discipline side rather than the Literacy side. This tension has slowed the
acceptance of ICT in normal teaching as numbers of Teachers have, at least subconsciously,
felt threatened by present developments. They fear they are being pressed to
develop competence in other than their specialised disciplines.
![]()
| Article: | Technology Foundation Standards for all Students. (National Educational Technology Standards (NETS).) |
| http://cnets.iste.org/sfors.htm |
Summary:
A framework for linking performance indicators within an ICT profile. There
are six standards for students:
Teachers:
1. Demonstrate a sound understanding of technology operations and concepts.
2. Plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported
by technology.
3. Implement curriculum plans that include methods and strategies for applying
technology to maximise student learning.
4. Apply technology in a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies.
5. Use technology to enhance their productivity and professional practice.
6. Understand the social, ethical, legal and human issues surrounding the use
of technology in their school and apply these principles in practice.
Reflection:
Only the first student standard relates solely to computer skills. The remaining
standards emphasise generally-focussed, non-technical skills, with wide application
in all learning (and living) experiences - social, collaboration, communication,
research, evaluate, strategies, decision-making.
The teacher standards cast a welcome focus on the teaching/learning process
rather than on the computer skills of the teacher (while not of course ignoring
the imortance of technical skills).
![]()
| Article: |
State of Wisconsin Information and Technology Literacy Standards |
| http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlcl/imt/itlstf.html |
Summary:
Summary: ICT standards are gathered into 4 main standards:
A.. Media and Technology
B.. Information and Enquiry
C.. Independent Learning
D.. The Learning Community
Reflection:
The Wisconsin standards are spelt out with specific outcomes for students at
the end of Year 4, Year 8 and Year 12. There are at least 60 specific outcomes
listed for standard D. The standards are indeed very detailed and comprehensive.
So much so that they impinge on the curriculum and teaching/learning programme.
For example:
A12.4(3) Employ FTP to retrieve and download computer files from a remote computer.
One advantage of the detail is to draw attention to the ICT skills that may
be useful. The downside is to clog the teaching/learning and assessment programs
with a large amount of detail. In addition, where ICT is used in an integrated
studies fashion, there is the issue of who is responsible for the outcome. In
this regard the Wisconsin standards (undated) contrast with the NETS standards
(also undated).
![]()